evidence_act_en_01

Under the law of evidence, the relevant fact

must be legally & logically relevant

must be legally & logically relevant and admissible.

must be legally relevant

must be logically relevant

Law of evidence is

lex loci solutionis

lex situs.

lexfori

lex tallienis

Under section 8 of Evidence Act

conduct is relevant

‘motive is relevant

preparation is relevant

all the above.

Several classes of facts, which are connected with the transaction(s) in a particular mode, are relevant

under section 7 of Evidence Act

under section 6 of Evidence Act

under section 8 of Evidence Act

under section 9 of Evidence Act.

Under the law of evidence, as a general rule

opinion whether on a matter of fact or law, is irrelevant.

opinion on a matter of law is relevant but not on a matter of fact

opinion on a matter of fact and law both are relevant

opinion on a matter of fact is relevant but not on a matter of law

The facts which form part of the same transaction are relevant

under section 7 of Evidence Act

under section 6 of Evidence Act

under section 8 of Evidence Act.

under section 5 of Evidence Act

Motives, of preparation and conduct are relevant

under section 7 of Evidence Act

under section 9 of Evidence Act.

under section 6 of Evidence Act

under section 8 of Evidence Act

Proof of a fact depends on

rigid mathematical demonstration.

artificial probative value assigned to a fact

not upon the accuracy of the statement but upon the probability of its existence

accuracy of the statement and not upon the probability of its existence

Law of evidence is

(b) an adjective law

(a) a substantive law

(d) neither (a) nor (b).

Relevancy is

question of procedure which can be waived.

question of law which can be waived

question of law and can be raised at any time

question of law but can be raised at the first opportunity

Bangladesh Evidence Act was drafted by

Sir Henry Summer Maine.

Lord Macaulay

Sir James F. Stephen

Huxley

The law of evidence consists of

ordinary rules of reasoning

all the above.

legal rules of evidence

rules of logic

A fact forming part of the same transaction is relevant under section 6 of Evidence Act

though not in issue and may have occurred at the same time & place or at different times& places

if it is in issue and have occurred at the same time & place

if it is in issue and may have occurred at different times & places

though not in issue, must have occurred at the same time & place.

What is correct as regards the admissibility of self-regarding statements

self-serving and self-harming statements both are generally inadmissible

self-serving and self-harming statements both are generally admissible

self-serving statement is admissible but a self-harming statement is not generally admissible

self-harming statement is admissible but a self-serving statement is not generally admissible

Fact in issue means

all the above.

fact, existence or non-existence of which is admitted by the parties

fact, existence or non-existence of which is disputed by the parties

fact existence or non-existence of which is not disputed by the parties

Which of the following documents are not admissible in evidence

(d) neither (a) nor (b).

(b) documents procured by illegal means

(a) documents improperly procured

Question of mode of proof is

a mixed question of law & fact.

a question of procedure but has to be raised at the first opportunity and stands waived if not raised at the first opportunity

a question of law which can be raised at any time

a question of procedure & can be raised at any time

Facts can be

physical facts

psychological facts

physical as well as psychological facts

only physical facts & not psychological facts.

Presumptions under the law of evidence are

(b) presumptions of law

(d) only (b) & not (a)

(a) presumption of facts

‘Self-regarding’ statements

can be self-serving statements

can be self-serving or self-harming

none of the above.

can be self-harming statements