evidence_act_en_01

Under the law of evidence, as a general rule

opinion on a matter of law is relevant but not on a matter of fact

opinion on a matter of fact is relevant but not on a matter of law

opinion whether on a matter of fact or law, is irrelevant.

opinion on a matter of fact and law both are relevant

Fact in issue means

fact, existence or non-existence of which is disputed by the parties

fact existence or non-existence of which is not disputed by the parties

fact, existence or non-existence of which is admitted by the parties

all the above.

The law of evidence consists of

rules of logic

all the above.

ordinary rules of reasoning

legal rules of evidence

Several classes of facts, which are connected with the transaction(s) in a particular mode, are relevant

under section 6 of Evidence Act

under section 7 of Evidence Act

under section 8 of Evidence Act

under section 9 of Evidence Act.

Facts can be

physical facts

psychological facts

physical as well as psychological facts

only physical facts & not psychological facts.

Under the law of evidence, the relevant fact

must be legally & logically relevant

must be legally relevant

must be legally & logically relevant and admissible.

must be logically relevant

‘Self-regarding’ statements

can be self-harming statements

none of the above.

can be self-serving or self-harming

can be self-serving statements

A fact forming part of the same transaction is relevant under section 6 of Evidence Act

if it is in issue and have occurred at the same time & place

though not in issue and may have occurred at the same time & place or at different times& places

if it is in issue and may have occurred at different times & places

though not in issue, must have occurred at the same time & place.

Motives, of preparation and conduct are relevant

under section 8 of Evidence Act

under section 9 of Evidence Act.

under section 6 of Evidence Act

under section 7 of Evidence Act

Proof of a fact depends on

accuracy of the statement and not upon the probability of its existence

rigid mathematical demonstration.

not upon the accuracy of the statement but upon the probability of its existence

artificial probative value assigned to a fact

Presumptions under the law of evidence are

(b) presumptions of law

(a) presumption of facts

(d) only (b) & not (a)

Which of the following documents are not admissible in evidence

(d) neither (a) nor (b).

(a) documents improperly procured

(b) documents procured by illegal means

Relevancy is

question of law but can be raised at the first opportunity

question of law which can be waived

question of law and can be raised at any time

question of procedure which can be waived.

Question of mode of proof is

a question of law which can be raised at any time

a question of procedure & can be raised at any time

a mixed question of law & fact.

a question of procedure but has to be raised at the first opportunity and stands waived if not raised at the first opportunity

Under section 8 of Evidence Act

‘motive is relevant

preparation is relevant

conduct is relevant

all the above.

Law of evidence is

(a) a substantive law

(d) neither (a) nor (b).

(b) an adjective law

The facts which form part of the same transaction are relevant

under section 5 of Evidence Act

under section 8 of Evidence Act.

under section 6 of Evidence Act

under section 7 of Evidence Act

Law of evidence is

lex tallienis

lexfori

lex situs.

lex loci solutionis

What is correct as regards the admissibility of self-regarding statements

self-serving and self-harming statements both are generally inadmissible

self-serving and self-harming statements both are generally admissible

self-serving statement is admissible but a self-harming statement is not generally admissible

self-harming statement is admissible but a self-serving statement is not generally admissible

Bangladesh Evidence Act was drafted by

Sir James F. Stephen

Sir Henry Summer Maine.

Lord Macaulay

Huxley