evidence_act_en_01

The law of evidence consists of

ordinary rules of reasoning

all the above.

legal rules of evidence

rules of logic

Presumptions under the law of evidence are

(d) only (b) & not (a)

(a) presumption of facts

(b) presumptions of law

Law of evidence is

lexfori

lex tallienis

lex situs.

lex loci solutionis

Question of mode of proof is

a question of procedure & can be raised at any time

a mixed question of law & fact.

a question of procedure but has to be raised at the first opportunity and stands waived if not raised at the first opportunity

a question of law which can be raised at any time

The facts which form part of the same transaction are relevant

under section 5 of Evidence Act

under section 8 of Evidence Act.

under section 6 of Evidence Act

under section 7 of Evidence Act

A fact forming part of the same transaction is relevant under section 6 of Evidence Act

if it is in issue and may have occurred at different times & places

though not in issue and may have occurred at the same time & place or at different times& places

if it is in issue and have occurred at the same time & place

though not in issue, must have occurred at the same time & place.

Facts can be

only physical facts & not psychological facts.

physical as well as psychological facts

physical facts

psychological facts

Under the law of evidence, as a general rule

opinion whether on a matter of fact or law, is irrelevant.

opinion on a matter of fact and law both are relevant

opinion on a matter of fact is relevant but not on a matter of law

opinion on a matter of law is relevant but not on a matter of fact

Which of the following documents are not admissible in evidence

(d) neither (a) nor (b).

(a) documents improperly procured

(b) documents procured by illegal means

Law of evidence is

(b) an adjective law

(d) neither (a) nor (b).

(a) a substantive law

Under the law of evidence, the relevant fact

must be legally & logically relevant

must be legally relevant

must be logically relevant

must be legally & logically relevant and admissible.

‘Self-regarding’ statements

can be self-harming statements

can be self-serving statements

can be self-serving or self-harming

none of the above.

What is correct as regards the admissibility of self-regarding statements

self-serving statement is admissible but a self-harming statement is not generally admissible

self-serving and self-harming statements both are generally admissible

self-harming statement is admissible but a self-serving statement is not generally admissible

self-serving and self-harming statements both are generally inadmissible

Bangladesh Evidence Act was drafted by

Lord Macaulay

Huxley

Sir Henry Summer Maine.

Sir James F. Stephen

Fact in issue means

fact existence or non-existence of which is not disputed by the parties

fact, existence or non-existence of which is disputed by the parties

fact, existence or non-existence of which is admitted by the parties

all the above.

Proof of a fact depends on

accuracy of the statement and not upon the probability of its existence

rigid mathematical demonstration.

artificial probative value assigned to a fact

not upon the accuracy of the statement but upon the probability of its existence

Several classes of facts, which are connected with the transaction(s) in a particular mode, are relevant

under section 9 of Evidence Act.

under section 7 of Evidence Act

under section 6 of Evidence Act

under section 8 of Evidence Act

Relevancy is

question of law which can be waived

question of procedure which can be waived.

question of law and can be raised at any time

question of law but can be raised at the first opportunity

Motives, of preparation and conduct are relevant

under section 8 of Evidence Act

under section 9 of Evidence Act.

under section 7 of Evidence Act

under section 6 of Evidence Act

Under section 8 of Evidence Act

all the above.

‘motive is relevant

preparation is relevant

conduct is relevant